4.8 Article

Characterization of photovoltaic devices for indoor light harvesting and customization of flexible dye solar cells to deliver superior efficiency under artificial lighting

Journal

APPLIED ENERGY
Volume 156, Issue -, Pages 413-422

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.07.031

Keywords

Energy harvesting; Indoor measurements; Amorphous silicon; Polycrystalline silicon; Dye sensitized solar cells; Light harvesting

Funding

  1. Polo Solare Organico Regione Lazio
  2. FP7 project CHEETAH [609788]
  3. AQUASOL PRIN [2012A4Z2RY]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The field of energy harvesting holds the promise of making our buildings smart if effective energy sources can be developed for use in ambient indoor conditions. Photovoltaics (PV), especially in its thin flexible form for easy integration, become a prime candidate for the aim, if tailored for low-density artificial light. We designed a test system which enabled us to measure the performance of PV devices under compact fluorescent lamp (CFL) and light-emitting diode (LED) illumination at different illuminance levels and compared polycrystalline and amorphous silicon cells with our own flexible dye solar cells (DSCs). Whereas poly-Si cells, with 15% outdoor efficiency, delivered at 200 lux under CFL only 2.8 mu W/cm(2) power density (and an efficiency of 4.4%), a-Si specifically designed for indoors, gave 5.9 mu W/cm(2) and 9.2% efficiency under the same CFL conditions (and 7.5% efficiency under LED). However, we show that the customization of flexible DSCs, by simply formulating ad-hoc less-concentrated, more transparent electrolytes, enabled these devices to outperform all others, providing average power densities of 8.0 mu W/cm(2) and 12.4% efficiencies under 200 lux CFL (more than quadruple compared to those measured at 1 sun), and 6.6 mu W/cm(2) and 10% efficiency under 200 lux LED illumination. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available