4.7 Article

Quantitative genetic analysis of chlorophyll a fluorescence parameters in maize in the field environments

Journal

JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE PLANT BIOLOGY
Volume 56, Issue 7, Pages 695-708

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/jipb.12179

Keywords

Chlorophyll a fluorescence parameters; field conditions; intermated B73 x Mo17 recombinant inbred lines; JIP-test; maize (Zea mays L.); quantitative trait loci

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science, Education and Sports, Republic of Croatia [073-0731674-1673, 073-0731674-0841, 073-0730463-0203]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chlorophyll fluorescence transient from initial to maximum fluorescence (P step) throughout two intermediate steps (J and I) (JIP-test) is considered a reliable early quantitative indicator of stress in plants. The JIP-test is particularly useful for crop plants when applied in variable field environments. The aim of the present study was to conduct a quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis for nine JIP-test parameters in maize during flowering in four field environments differing in weather conditions. QTL analysis and identification of putative candidate genes might help to explain the genetic relationship between photosynthesis and different field scenarios in maize plants. The JIP-test parameters were analyzed in the intermated B73 x Mo17 (IBM) maize population of 205 recombinant inbred lines. A set of 2,178 molecular markers across the whole maize genome was used for QTL analysis revealing 10 significant QTLs for seven JIP-test parameters, of which five were co-localized when combined over the four environments indicating polygenic inheritance and pleiotropy. Our results demonstrate that QTL analysis of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters was capable of detecting one pleiotropic locus on chromosome 7, coinciding with the gene gst23 that may be associated with efficient photosynthesis under different field scenarios.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available