4.5 Review

The position of strontium ranelate in today's management of osteoporosis

Journal

OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages 1667-1671

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-015-3109-y

Keywords

Efficacy; Osteoporosis; Safety; Strontium ranelate; Treatment

Funding

  1. Servier
  2. Novartis
  3. Negma
  4. Lilly
  5. Wyeth
  6. Amgen
  7. GlaxoSmithKline
  8. Roche
  9. Merckle
  10. Nycomed
  11. NPS
  12. Theramex
  13. UCB
  14. Merck Sharp and Dohme
  15. Rottapharm
  16. IBSA
  17. Genevrier
  18. Teijin
  19. Teva
  20. Ebewee Pharma
  21. Zodiac
  22. Analis
  23. Novo Nordisk
  24. Bristol Myers Squibb
  25. Eli Lilly
  26. Merck Sharp Dohme
  27. Spa
  28. Stroder
  29. Alliance for Better Bone Health
  30. Ferring
  31. MSD
  32. Medtronic
  33. Roche diagnostics
  34. Pfizer
  35. Amgen Inc.
  36. Preglem
  37. Leon Farma
  38. Gynea
  39. Sandoz
  40. Bayer
  41. Merck Sharp
  42. Dohme
  43. Takeda
  44. Danone
  45. MRC [MC_U147585827] Funding Source: UKRI
  46. Medical Research Council [MC_U147585827, MC_U147585824, U1475000001, MC_UP_A620_1014, MC_UU_12011/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  47. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0508-10082, NF-SI-0513-10085] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Osteoporosis accounts for about 3% of total European health-care spending. The low proportion of costs for the pharmacological prevention of osteoporotic fracture means that it is highly cost saving, especially in patient with severe osteoporosis or patients who cannot take certain osteoporosis medications due to issues of contraindications or tolerability. Following recent regulatory changes, strontium ranelate is now indicated in patients with severe osteoporosis for whom treatment with other osteoporosis treatments is not possible, and without contraindications including uncontrolled hypertension, established, current or past history of ischaemic heart disease, peripheral arterial disease, and/or cerebrovascular disease. We review here today's evidence for the safety and efficacy of strontium ranelate. The efficacy of strontium ranelate in patients complying with the new prescribing information (i.e. severe osteoporosis without contraindications) has been explored in a multivariate analysis of clinical trial data, which concluded that the antifracture efficacy of strontium ranelate is maintained in patients with severe osteoporosis without contraindications and also demonstrated how the new target population mitigates risk. Strontium ranelate is therefore an important alternative in today's management of osteoporosis, with a positive benefit-risk balance, provided that the revised indication and contraindications are followed and cardiovascular risk is monitored. The bone community should be reassured that there remain viable alternatives in patients in whom treatment with other agents is not possible and protection against the debilitating effects of fracture is still feasible in patients with severe osteoporosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available