4.8 Article

A novel Gaussian model based battery state estimation approach: State-of-Energy

Journal

APPLIED ENERGY
Volume 151, Issue -, Pages 41-48

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.062

Keywords

Electric vehicles; Lithium-ion battery; State of energy; Gaussian model; Akaike information criterion; Central difference Kalman filter

Funding

  1. National Science & Technology Pillar Program [2013BAG05B00]
  2. Beijing Institute of Technology Research Fund Program for Young Scholars
  3. Excellent young scholars Research Fund of Beijing Institute of Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

State-of-energy (SoE) is a very important index for battery management system (BMS) used in electric vehicles (EVs), it is indispensable for ensuring safety and reliable operation of batteries. For achieving battery SoE accurately, the main work can be summarized in three aspects. (1) In considering that different kinds of batteries show different open circuit voltage behaviors, the Gaussian model is employed to construct the battery model. What is more, the genetic algorithm is employed to locate the optimal parameter for the selecting battery model. (2) To determine an optimal tradeoff between battery model complexity and prediction precision, the Akaike information criterion (AIC) is used to determine the best hysteresis order of the combined battery model. Results from a comparative analysis show that the first-order hysteresis battery model is thought of being the best based on the AIC values. (3) The central difference Kalman filter (CDKF) is used to estimate the real-time SoE and an erroneous initial SoE is considered to evaluate the robustness of the SoE estimator. Lastly, two kinds of lithium-ion batteries are used to verify the proposed SoE estimation approach. The results show that the maximum SoE estimation error is within 1% for both LiFePO4 and LiMn2O4 battery datasets. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available