4.5 Article

Nectarivory by the plant-tissue feeding predator Macrolophus pygmaeus Rambur (Heteroptera: Miridae): Nutritional redundancy or nutritional benefit?

Journal

JOURNAL OF INSECT PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 58, Issue 3, Pages 397-401

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2011.12.013

Keywords

Conservation biological control; Plant-provided food; Omnivory; Longevity; Fecundity

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [AGL2006-08726, AGL2008-00546]
  2. National Institute for Agriculture and Food Research and Technology (INIA)
  3. Natural Environment Research Council [ceh010010] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Most predators and parasitoids feed on plant-provided food (nectar, pollen) or engage in herbivory during at least part of their life stages. Plant feeding by these insects plays an important role in driving predator-herbivore dynamics. Thus, understanding the effects of plant feeding on omnivores could be an important element in improving biological control strategies. The mind Macrolophus pygmaeus is an omnivorous heteropteran predator of whitefly and other pests. Unlike other predators that need to seek out accessible nectar to meet their carbohydrate requirements, mind bugs can access the planis carbohydrate resources by feeding directly on plant tissues. Leaf and stem feeding could be seen as a nutritional surrogate that allows minds to become independent of nectar availability. However, to date feeding experiments have not yet considered nectar feeding by these mind predators. In this study we demonstrate that M. pygmaeus survival is prolonged on broad bean plants featuring extrafloral nectar as compared to broad bean with extrafloral nectaries removed, irrespective of the presence of cattail pollen. Survival on extrafloral nectar was comparable to the survival by individuals kept on broad bean provided with eggs of Ephestia kuehniella as prey. Also, a greater proportion of mind females laid eggs when extrafloral nectar was available as compared to those confined on nectariless plants without supplemental food. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available