4.5 Article

Accumulation and excretion of morphine by Calliphora stygia, an Australian blow fly species of forensic importance

Journal

JOURNAL OF INSECT PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 57, Issue 1, Pages 62-73

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2010.09.005

Keywords

Calliphora stygia; Morphine; Forensic entomology; Malpighian tubule; Morphine metabolism

Funding

  1. Deakin University
  2. Australian Pacific Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the ability of the forensically important blow fly, Calliphora stygia to actively excrete morphine, thereby maintaining a low morphine level within its body when fed on a diet containing morphine at low (7 pmol g(-1)) and high (17.5 pmol g(-1)) concentrations. Morphine was accumulated within the bodies of maggots (approximate to 70% within the tissues) at concentrations which were lower than that of the meat (3-24%). The morphine content of the initial developing stages (second and third instar maggots) maintained on the high morphine diet was higher than those on the low morphine diet. Morphine was cleared from the body with negatively exponential kinetics (High morphine group: Morphine (pmol g(-1) wet weight) = 8425e(-0.014t). Low morphine group: Morphine (pmol g(-1) wet weight) = 2180e(-0.010t)). Clearance constants for morphine by animals in both groups were similar and thus both groups had a similar ability to excrete morphine. The Malpighian tubules of maggots were able to actively secrete morphine using a transport mechanism that transports small type II organic cations, such as morphine and quinine. The rate of morphine secretion by the Malpighian tubules could explain the clearance of the drug by the maggots. As the morphine was transported across the Malpighian tubules cells, a significant proportion was metabolised into a compound that is yet to be fully characterised. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available