4.5 Article

Cloning and characterization of a Gasp homolog from the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana, and its putative role in cuticle formation

Journal

JOURNAL OF INSECT PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 56, Issue 10, Pages 1427-1435

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2009.12.006

Keywords

Chonstoneura fumiferana gasp; Cuticle; Chitin-binding domain

Funding

  1. Canadian Regulatory System for Biotechnology (CRSB)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Proteins that are capable of binding chitin play essential roles in the synthesis and structural integrity of the insect cuticle and pentrophic matrix. In the course of developing expressed sequence tag (EST) libraries for the eastern spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana, we identified an abundant cDNA encoding a homolog of the Drosophila gasp gene (Gene Analogous to Small Pentrophins). For the present work, we undertook the characterization of this new homolog, CfGasp, in an effort to identify its role during larval development As shown for DmGasp, the C fumiferana homolog was found to contain three type-2 chitin-binding domains (CBDs), which were also found in Gasp orthologs retrieved from GenBank In a phylogenetic analysis, these Gasp proteins formed a tight cluster, distinct from the midgut-specific peritrophins with which they share the cysteine-containing CBDs so far considered absent from cuticular proteins However, unlike what has been shown for pentrophins. CfGasp transcript levels were low in larval midguts and most abundant in epidermis, while they were low in trachea and ovaries. Transcript levels increased during larval molts in a pattern similar to that observed for exocuticular proteins in other Insects In addition, the recombinant protein was shown to be capable of binding chitin Altogether, these results suggest a structural role for CfGasp in exocuticle formation. Crown Copyright (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available