4.4 Article

Non-specific accumulation of glycosphingolipids in GNE myopathy

Journal

JOURNAL OF INHERITED METABOLIC DISEASE
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages 297-308

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10545-013-9655-6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Oxford Glycobiology Institute, Oxford, UK
  2. l'Association Vaincre les maladies lysosomales
  3. National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

UDP-GlcNAc 2-epimerase/ManNAc 6-kinase (GNE) is a bifunctional enzyme responsible for the first committed steps in the synthesis of sialic acid, a common terminal monosaccharide in both protein and lipid glycosylation. GNE mutations are responsible for a rare autosomal recessive neuromuscular disorder, GNE myopathy (also called hereditary inclusion body myopathy). The connection between the impairment of sialic acid synthesis and muscle pathology in GNE myopathy remains poorly understood. Glycosphingolipid (GSL) analysis was performed by HPLC in multiple models of GNE myopathy, including patients' fibroblasts and plasma, control fibroblasts with inhibited GNE epimerase activity through a novel imino sugar, and tissues of Gne(M712T/M712T) knock-in mice. Not only neutral GSLs, but also sialylated GSLs, were significantly increased compared to controls in all tested models of GNE myopathy. Treatment of GNE myopathy fibroblasts with N-acetylmannosamine (ManNAc), a sialic acid precursor downstream of GNE epimerase activity, ameliorated the increased total GSL concentrations. GNE myopathy models have increased total GSL concentrations. ManNAc supplementation results in decrease of GSL levels, linking abnormal increase of total GSLs in GNE myopathy to defects in the sialic acid biosynthetic pathway. These data advocate for further exploring GSL concentrations as an informative biomarker, not only for GNE myopathy, but also for other disorders of sialic acid metabolism.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available