4.7 Article

Vaccine-Associated Paralytic Poliomyelitis: A Review of the Epidemiology and Estimation of the Global Burden

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 210, Issue -, Pages S380-S389

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiu184

Keywords

inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV); oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV); OPV cessation; OPV withdrawal; polio endgame; polio eradication; poliomyelitis; vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis (VAPP)

Funding

  1. World Health Organization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis (VAPP) is a rare adverse event associated with oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV). This review summarizes the epidemiology and provides a global burden estimate. Methods.aEuro integral A literature review was conducted to abstract the epidemiology and calculate the risk of VAPP. A bootstrap method was applied to calculate global VAPP burden estimates. Results.aEuro integral Trends in VAPP epidemiology varied by country income level. In the low-income country, the majority of cases occurred in individuals who had received > 3 doses of OPV (63%), whereas in middle and high-income countries, most cases occurred in recipients after their first OPV dose or unvaccinated contacts (81%). Using all risk estimates, VAPP risk was 4.7 cases per million births (range, 2.4-9.7), leading to a global annual burden estimate of 498 cases (range, 255-1018). If the analysis is limited to estimates from countries that currently use OPV, the VAPP risk is 3.8 cases per million births (range, 2.9-4.7) and a burden of 399 cases (range, 306-490). Conclusions.aEuro integral Because many high-income countries have replaced OPV with inactivated poliovirus vaccine, the VAPP burden is concentrated in lower-income countries. The planned universal introduction of inactivated poliovirus vaccine is likely to substantially decrease the global VAPP burden by 80%-90%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available