4.7 Article

Efficacy and Safety of Triple Combination Therapy With Artesunate-Amodiaquine-Methylene Blue for Falciparum Malaria in Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Burkina Faso

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 211, Issue 5, Pages 689-697

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiu540

Keywords

Africa; malaria; methylene blue; gametocytes

Funding

  1. German Science Foundation [Sonderforschungsbereich 544]
  2. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1034789]
  3. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1034789] Funding Source: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Methylene blue (MB) has been shown to be safe and effective against falciparum malaria in Africa and to have pronounced gametocytocidal properties. Methods. Three days of treatment with artesunate (AS)-amodiaquine (AQ) combined with MB was compared with AS-AQ treatment in a randomized controlled phase IIb study; the study included 221 children aged 6-59 months with uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Burkina Faso. The primary end point was gametocyte prevalence during follow-up, as determined by microscopy and real-time quantitative nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (QT-NASBA). Results. The gametocyte prevalence of Plasmodium falciparum at baseline was 3.6% (microscopy) and 97% (QT-NASBA). It was significantly lower in the AS-AQ-MB than in the AS-AQ group on day 7 of follow-up (microscopy, 1.2% vs 8.9% [P<.05]; QT-NASBA, 36.7% vs 63.3% [P<.001]). Hemoglobin values were significantly lower in the AS-AQ-MB group than in the AS-AQ group at days 2 and 7 of follow-up. Vomiting of the study medication occurred significantly more frequently in the AS-AQ-MB group. Conclusions. The combination of MB with an artemisinin-based combination therapy has been confirmed to be effective against the gametocytes of P. falciparum. MB-based combinations need to be compared with primaquine-based combinations, preferably using MB in an improved pediatric formulation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available