4.7 Article

Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in Households With Children During the 2012-2013 Season: Assessments of Prior Vaccination and Serologic Susceptibility

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 211, Issue 10, Pages 1519-1528

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiu650

Keywords

influenza; vaccine effectiveness; households with children; serologic susceptibility

Funding

  1. CDC [U01 IP000474]
  2. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [R01 AI097150]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Methods.aEuro integral We recruited 321 households with 1426 members, including 833 children, and followed them during the 2012-2013 influenza season; specimens were collected from subjects with reported acute respiratory illnesses. We estimated the effectiveness of documented influenza vaccination in preventing laboratory-confirmed influenza, using adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. Antibody titers in a subset of subjects were determined by a hemagglutination inhibition assay to determine the subjects' preseason susceptibility to influenza. Results.aEuro integral Influenza was identified in 76 (24%) households and 111 (8%) individuals. VE point estimates indicated significant protection in adults (48%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1%-72%), similar protection in children aged 9-17 years (49%; 95% CI, -16% to 78%), but no evidence of effectiveness in children aged < 9 years (-4%; 95% CI, -110% to 49%). Lower VE was observed in those vaccinated in both the current and prior seasons, compared with those vaccinated in the current season only; susceptibility titers against type A but not type B were consistent with this observation. Residual protection from vaccination in the prior season was indicated by both VE and serologic results. Conclusions.aEuro integral Prior vaccination appears to modify VE by both residual protection and reduced vaccine response.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available