4.7 Article

Safety and Immunogenicity of an AS01-adjuvanted Varicella-zoster Virus Subunit Candidate Vaccine Against Herpes Zoster in Adults ≥50 Years of Age

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 208, Issue 12, Pages 1953-1961

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jit365

Keywords

varicella-zoster virus; recombinant subunit vaccine; adjuvant; safety; immunogenicity

Funding

  1. GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA, Belgium

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. An adjuvanted varicella-zoster virus glycoprotein E (gE) subunit vaccine candidate for herpes zoster is in development. In this trial we compared the safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity of the vaccine antigen combined with different adjuvant doses. Methods. This was a phase II, observer-blind, randomized, multinational study. Adults >= 50 years old were randomized 4:4:2:1 to be vaccinated at months 0 and 2 with gE combined with a higher (AS01(B)) or lower (AS01(E)) dose adjuvant, unadjuvanted gE, or saline. Following each dose, solicited events were recorded for 7 days and unsolicited adverse events for 30 days. Serious adverse events were collected for 1 year. Cell-mediated and humoral immune responses were assessed at baseline and following each dose. Results. No vaccine-related severe adverse events were reported. Solicited adverse events were generally mild to moderate and transient. For all gE-based vaccines, pain was the most common local symptom and fatigue the most common general symptom. Immune responses were significantly enhanced by AS01(B) and AS01(E) compared to unadjuvanted gE and were significantly stronger for gE/AS01(B) than for gE/AS01(E). Conclusions. AS01 improved the immunogenicity of gE while retaining acceptable safety and reactogenicity profiles. The enhancement of gE-specific cellular and humoral responses was adjuvant dose dependent.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available