4.7 Article

The First Identification and Retrospective Study of Severe Fever With Thrombocytopenia Syndrome in Japan

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 209, Issue 6, Pages 816-827

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jit603

Keywords

Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome; SFTS; SFTS virus: Japan; tick borne virus infection; bunyavirus; Hemophagocytosis

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare Science Research [H24-Shinko-Ippan-013, H22-Shinko-Ippan-006, H25-Shinko-Shitei-009]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24780303, 25304043] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome (SFTS) is caused by SFTS virus (SFTSV), a novel bunyavirus reported to be endemic in central and northeastern China. This article describes the first identified patient with SFTS and a retrospective study on SFTS in Japan. Methods. Virologic and pathologic examinations were performed on the patient's samples. Laboratory diagnosis of SFTS was made by isolation/genome amplification and/or the detection of anti-SFTSV immunoglobulin G antibody in sera. Physicians were alerted to the initial diagnosis and asked whether they had previously treated patients with symptoms similar to those of SFTS. Results. A female patient who died in 2012 received a diagnosis of SFTS. Ten additional patients with SFTS were then retrospectively identified. All patients were aged >= 50 years and lived in western Japan. Six cases were fatal. The ratio of males to females was 8: 3. SFTSV was isolated from 8 patients. Phylogenetic analyses indicated that all of the Japanese SFTSV isolates formed a genotype independent to those from China. Most patients showed symptoms due to hemorrhage, possibly because of disseminated intravascular coagulation and/or hemophagocytosis. Conclusions. SFTS has been endemic to Japan, and SFTSV has been circulating naturally within the country.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available