4.7 Article

Etiology of Diarrhea in Bangladeshi Infants in the First Year of Life Analyzed Using Molecular Methods

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 208, Issue 11, Pages 1794-1802

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jit507

Keywords

Diarrhea; PCR; rotavirus; enteroaggregative e.coli; Campylobacter

Funding

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health [U01 AI075396, R01 AI043596]
  2. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Diarrhea causes enormous morbidity and mortality in developing countries, yet the relative importance of multiple potential enteropathogens has been difficult to ascertain. Methods. We performed a longitudinal cohort study from birth to 1 year of age in 147 infants in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Using multiplex polymerase chain reaction, we analyzed 420 episodes of diarrhea and 1385 monthly surveillance stool specimens for 32 enteropathogen gene targets. For each infant we examined enteropathogen quantities over time to ascribe each positive target as a probable or less-likely contributor to diarrhea. Results. Multiple enteropathogens were detected by the first month of life. Diarrhea was associated with a state of overall pathogen excess (mean number of enteropathogen gene targets (+/-SE), 5.6 +/- 0.1 vs 4.3 +/- 0.1 in surveillance stool specimens; P < .05). After a longitudinal, quantitative approach was applied to filter out less-likely contributors, each diarrheal episode still had an average of 3.3 probable or dominant targets. Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli, Campylobacter, enteropathogenic E. coli, rotavirus, and Entamoeba histolytica were the most frequent probable contributors to diarrhea. Rotavirus was enriched in moderate to severe diarrheal episodes. Conclusions. In this community-based study diarrhea seemed to be a multipathogen event and a state of enteropathogen excess above a high carriage baseline.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available