4.7 Article

A Single Dose of Any of Four Different Live Attenuated Tetravalent Dengue Vaccines Is Safe and Immunogenic in Flavivirus-naive Adults: A Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 207, Issue 6, Pages 957-965

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jis936

Keywords

dengue vaccine; live attenuated tetravalent; clinical trial

Funding

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health [HHSN272200900010C]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Dengue virus (DENV) causes hundreds of millions of infections annually. Four dengue sero-types exist, and previous infection with one serotype increases the likelihood of severe disease with a second, heterotypic DENV infection. Methods. In a randomized, placebo-controlled study, the safety and immunogenicity of 4 different admixtures of a live attenuated tetravalent (LATV) dengue vaccine were evaluated in 113 flavivirus-naive adults. Serum neutralizing antibody levels to all 4 dengue viruses were measured on days 0, 28, 42, and 180. Results. A single dose of each LATV admixture induced a trivalent or better neutralizing antibody response in 75%-90% of vaccinees. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between vaccinees and placebo-recipients other than rash. A trivalent or better response correlated with rash and with non-black race (P < .0001). Black race was significantly associated with a reduced incidence of vaccine viremia. Conclusions. TV003 induced a trivalent or greater antibody response in 90% of flavivirus-naive vaccinees and is a promising candidate for the prevention of dengue. Race was identified as a factor influencing the infectivity of the LATV viruses, reflecting observations of the effect of race on disease severity in natural dengue infection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available