4.7 Article

Toxoplasma Serotype Is Associated With Development of Ocular Toxoplasmosis

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 208, Issue 9, Pages 1520-1528

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jit313

Keywords

Diagnosis; ocular inflammatory disease; serotype; toxoplasmosis; uveitis

Funding

  1. Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health (NIH)
  2. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
  3. ToxoNet, a program of the German Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Worldwide, ocular toxoplasmosis (OT) is the principal cause of posterior uveitis, a severe, life-altering disease. A Toxoplasma gondii enzyme-linked immunoassay that detects strain-specific antibodies present in serum was used to correlate serotype with disease. Methods. Toxoplasma serotypes in consecutive serum samples from German uveitis patients with OT were compared with non-OT seropositive patients with noninfectious autoimmune posterior uveitis. OT patients were tested for association of parasite serotype with age, gender, location, clinical onset, size, visual acuity, or number of lesions (mean follow-up, 3.8 years) to determine association with recurrences. Results. A novel, nonreactive (NR) serotype was detected more frequently in serum samples of OT patients (50/114, 44%) than in non-OT patients (4/56, 7%) (odds ratio, 10.0; 95% confidence interval 3.4-40.8; P < .0001). Non-OT patients were predominantly infected with Type II strains (39/56; 70%), consistent with expected frequencies in Central Europe. Among OT patients, those with NR serotypes experienced more frequent recurrences (P = .037). Polymerase chain reaction detected parasite DNA in 8/60 OT aqueous humor specimens but failed to identify Type II strain alleles. Conclusions. Toxoplasma NR and Type II serotypes predominate in German OT patients. The NR serotype is associated with OT recurrences, underscoring the value of screening for management of disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available