4.7 Article

Specific T Cells Restore the Autophagic Flux Inhibited by Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Human Primary Macrophages

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 205, Issue 9, Pages 1425-1435

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jis226

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry of Health [RF -IMI-2009 1302952, RF07.103]
  2. European Community

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Autophagy inhibits survival of intracellular Mycobacterium tuberculosis when induced by rapamycin or interferon gamma (IFN-gamma), but it remains unclear whether M. tuberculosis itself can induce autophagy and whether T cells play a role in M. tuberculosis-mediated autophagy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of M. tuberculosis on autophagy in human primary macrophages and the role of specific T cells in this process. Methods. M. tuberculosis (H37Rv)-infected macrophages were incubated with naive or M. tuberculosis-specific T cells. Autophagy was evaluated at 4 hours and 8 hours after infection by analyzing the levels of LC3-II (a hallmark of autophagy) and p62 (a protein degraded by autophagy). M. tuberculosis survival was evaluated by counting the colony-forming units. Results. M. tuberculosis infection of macrophages inhibited the autophagic process at 8 hours after infection. Naive T cells could not rescue this block, whereas M. tuberculosis-specific T cells restored autophagy degradation, accompanied by enhanced bacterial killing. Notably, the effect of M. tuberculosis-specific T cells was not affected by neutralization of endogenous IFN-gamma and tumor necrosis factor alpha and was blocked by preventing contact between macrophages and T cells, suggesting that cell-cell interaction is crucial. Conclusions. M. tuberculosis inhibits autophagy in human primary macrophages, and specific T cells can restore functional autophagic flux through cell-cell contact.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available