4.7 Article

Immune Response to Hepatitis B Virus Vaccination Among HIV-1 Infected And Uninfected Adults in Kenya

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 207, Issue 3, Pages 402-410

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jis695

Keywords

HBV vaccine; HIV-1; Africa

Funding

  1. Fogarty International Center, US National Institutes of Health [D43 TW000007]
  2. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [47674]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. In studies from high-income countries, human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected persons have diminished responses to hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination, compared with HIV-1-uninfected persons, but data from other settings are limited. Methods. We compared the immune response to HBV vaccination among HIV-1-infected and HIV-1-uninfected Kenyan adults and assessed the response of HIV-1-infected initial nonresponders to revaccination with a standard HBV vaccine series. Results. Of 603 participants, 310 (51.4%) were HIV-1-infected, for whom the median CD4(+) T-cell count was 557 cells/mu L (interquartile range, 428-725 cells/mu L); none were receiving antiretroviral therapy. Nonresponse to HBV vaccine was higher among HIV-1-infected participants, compared with HIV-1-uninfected participants (35.8% vs 14.3%; odds ratio, 3.33; P <.001). Of 102 HIV-1-infected initial nonresponders, 88 (86.3%) responded to revaccination, for an overall response, including to revaccination, of 94.9%. Among HIV-1-infected individuals, lower CD4(+) T-cell counts and male sex were independent predictors of nonresponse to initial vaccination, and lower body mass index, higher plasma HIV-1 RNA levels, and longer time to revaccination predicted nonresponse to revaccination. Conclusions. Kenyan adults had similar HBV vaccination responses as persons from high-income countries. Timely revaccination of HIV-1-infected nonresponders increased response to the vaccine to 95%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available