4.7 Article

Epidemic Sindbis Virus Infection in Finland: A Population-Based Case-Control Study of Risk Factors

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 204, Issue 3, Pages 459-466

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jir267

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Finnish Ministry of Health
  2. National Public Health Institute
  3. University of Helsinki
  4. Emil Aaltonen Foundation
  5. Helsinki Biomedical Graduate School
  6. Academy of Finland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Sindbis virus (SINV) is an arthropod-borne alphavirus that causes rash and arthritis. In Finland, epidemics occur cyclically, but factors associated with clinical SINV infection are largely unknown. We conducted a population-based case-control study during the epidemic year 2002. Methods. SINV cases were serologically confirmed and reported to the National Infectious Disease Registry. Five control subjects, matched for age, sex, and residence, were selected from the National Population Information System. Data were collected using a self-administered mail survey. Conditional logistic regression models were used to identify independent risk factors; missing data were addressed using Bayesian full-likelihood modeling. Results. A total of 337 case patients (58% female; age range, 1-94 y) and 934 control subjects were enrolled. Reported exposure to mosquito bites (matched odds ratio [mOR], 16.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9.1-33.4) and spending time in woods or marshland (mOR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.3-2.5) were independently associated with SINV infection in the multivariable model. The population-attributable risk for mosquito bites was 87.2%. There were dose-response relations for increased number of insect bites (mOR, 23.8-72.5) and increased time spent in woods or marshland (mOR, 1.3-2.2). Conclusions. Educating the public in endemic areas to avoid mosquito exposure and use protective measures remain important prevention measures for SINV infection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available