4.7 Article

Immunogenicity of an Inactivated Monovalent 2009 H1N1 Influenza Vaccine in Pregnant Women

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 204, Issue 6, Pages 854-863

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jir440

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Novartis
  2. Sanofi Pasteur
  3. GlaxoSmithKline
  4. Wyeth
  5. CSL
  6. Cubist Pharmaceuticals
  7. Merck
  8. National Institutes of Health [HHSN272200800004C, HHSN272200800057C, HHSN27220080000C, HHSN272200800002C, HHSN272200800003C, N01-AI-30063]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Although pregnant women are at increased risk of severe illness following influenza infection, there is relatively little information on the immunogenicity of influenza vaccines administered during pregnancy. Methods. We conducted a clinical trial that enrolled 120 pregnant women in which participants were randomly assigned to receive an inactivated 2009 H1N1 influenza vaccine containing either 25 mu g or 49 mu g of hemagglutinin (HA) in a 2-dose series with a 21-day period between administration of the first and second doses. Results. Following the first vaccination, HA inhibition (HAI) titers of >= 1:40 were detected in 93% (95% confidence interval [CI], 82%-98%) of subjects who received the 25-mu g dose and 97% (95% CI, 88%-100%) of subjects receiving the 49-mu g dose. In cord blood samples, HAI titers of >= 1:40 were found in 87% (95% CI, 73%-96%) of samples from the 25-mu g dose group and in 89% (95% CI, 76%-96%) from the 49-mu g dose group. Microneutralization titers tended to be higher than HAI titers, but the patterns of response were similar. Conclusions. In pregnant women, 1 dose of an inactivated 2009 H1N1 influenza vaccine containing 25 mu g of HA elicited an antibody response typically associated with protection against influenza infection. Efficient transplacental transfer of antibody was also documented.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available