4.7 Article

Viral Shedding and Clinical Illness in Naturally Acquired Influenza Virus Infections

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 201, Issue 10, Pages 1509-1516

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1086/652241

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [1 U01 CI000439-02]
  2. Research Fund for the Control of Infectious Disease, Food and Health Bureau, Government of the Hong Kong SAR [08070632]
  3. Harvard Center for Communicable Disease Dynamics from the US National Institutes of Health Models of Infectious Disease Agent Study [1 U54 GM088558]
  4. Area of Excellence Scheme of the Hong Kong University Grants Committee [AoE/M-12/06]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Volunteer challenge studies have provided detailed data on viral shedding from the respiratory tract before and through the course of experimental influenza virus infection. There are no comparable quantitative data to our knowledge on naturally acquired infections. Methods. In a community-based study in Hong Kong in 2008, we followed up initially healthy individuals to quantify trends in viral shedding on the basis of cultures and reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) through the course of illness associated with seasonal influenza A and B virus infection. Results. Trends in symptom scores more closely matched changes in molecular viral loads measured with RT-PCR for influenza A than for influenza B. For influenza A virus infections, the replicating viral loads determined with cultures decreased to undetectable levels earlier after illness onset than did molecular viral loads. Most viral shedding occurred during the first 2-3 days after illness onset, and we estimated that 1%-8% of infectiousness occurs prior to illness onset. Only 14% of infections with detectable shedding at RT-PCR were asymptomatic, and viral shedding was low in these cases. Conclusions. Our results suggest that silent spreaders (ie, individuals who are infectious while asymptomatic or presymptomatic) may be less important in the spread of influenza epidemics than previously thought.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available