4.7 Article

Population Structure and Capsular Switching of Invasive Neisseria meningitidis Isolates in the Pre-Meningococcal Conjugate Vaccine Era-United States, 2000-2005

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 201, Issue 8, Pages 1208-1224

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1086/651505

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention
  2. Sanofi Pasteur

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. A quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MCV4) was licensed in the United States in 2005; no serogroup B vaccine is available. Neisseria meningitidis changes its capsular phenotype through capsular switching, which has implications for vaccines that do not protect against all serogroups. Methods. Meningococcal isolates from 10 Active Bacterial Core surveillance sites from 2000 through 2005 were analyzed to identify changes occurring after MCV4 licensure. Isolates were characterized by multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and outer membrane protein gene sequencing. Isolates expressing capsular polysaccharide different from that associated with the MLST lineage were considered to demonstrate capsular switching. Results. Among 1160 isolates, the most common genetic lineages were the sequence type (ST)- 23, ST-32, ST-11, and ST-41/44 clonal complexes. Of serogroup B and Y isolates, 8 (1.5%) and 3 (0.9%), respectively, demonstrated capsular switching, compared with 36 (12.9%) for serogroup C (P < .001); most serogroup C switches were from virulent serogroup B and/or serogroup Y lineages. Conclusions. A limited number of genetic lineages caused the majority of invasive meningococcal infections. A substantial proportion of isolates had evidence of capsular switching. The high prevalence of capsular switching requires surveillance to detect changes in the meningococcal population structure that may affect the effectiveness of meningococcal vaccines.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available