4.7 Article

Circulating Antibody-Secreting Cells during Acute Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection in Adults

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 202, Issue 11, Pages 1659-1666

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1086/657158

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Trellis Bioscience [K23 AI 67501, U01 AI 045969, HHSN2662005500029C, N01-AI-500209]
  2. GlaxoSmithKline
  3. Sanofi Pasteur

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. The specificity and duration of circulating human antibody-secreting cells (ASCs) after vaccination have been well described, but characteristics of ASCs during acute respiratory infections have not been well studied. Methods. Circulating antigen-specific ASCs were measured at 3 time points (enrollment, days 10-16, and days 22-45) in 40 adults during respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection. Results. Of the 40 patients, 36 (90%) had detectable circulating RSV F protein-specific ASCs within 11 days after illness onset. The magnitude of the RSV-specific ASCs was 1-1500 spots per 10(6) peripheral blood mononuclear cells (mean frequency [+/- standard deviation], 200 +/- 256 spots per 10(6) peripheral blood mononuclear cells). ASCs were detected on day 8-16 and day 22-45 after symptom onset in 78% and 48% of subjects, respectively. Subjects shedding virus for >10 days were more likely to have a positive response to ASC enzyme-linked immunospot assay at the late time point than those shedding for <= 10 days (8 of 12 subjects vs 2 of 11 subjects; P = .02). Conclusions. The kinetics of ASC circulation during acute mucosal viral infections was more prolonged than that we had observed after a single intramuscular injection with inactivated influenza vaccine in a study reported elsewhere. The association between the duration of virus shedding and the persistence of detectable viral-specific ASCs suggests that ongoing antigen persistence induces a prolonged temporal pattern of ASC generation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available