4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Perfusion Abnormalities in Children with Cerebral Malaria and Malarial Retinopathy

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 199, Issue 2, Pages 263-271

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/595735

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI034969] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Wellcome Trust [074125/Z/04/Z, 074124] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. In patients with cerebral malaria (CM), retinal angiography allows the study of infected central nervous system microvasculature in vivo. We aimed to examine retinal perfusion in children with CM by use of fluorescein angiography to investigate the pathophysiology of CM. Methods. We performed fluorescein angiography on children with CM admitted to Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital, Malawi. We related angiograms to funduscopic findings. Results. Fluorescein angiography was performed for 34 patients with CM, and impaired perfusion was identified in 28 (82%). Areas of capillary nonperfusion (CNP) were seen in 26 patients (76%). Multiple, scattered areas of CNP were typical and topographically matched to retinal whitening. Larger retinal vessels were occluded in 9 patients (26%) who had associated ischemia. These vessels appeared white on ophthalmoscopy. Intravascular abnormalities were seen in 9 patients (26%), including filling defects and mottling of the blood column. Limited fluorescein leakage occurred in 15 patients (44%) and was not related to angiographic intravascular abnormalities or visible vessel discoloration. Conclusions. Impaired perfusion occurs in the retinal microvasculature of most children with CM. This is evidence for hypoxia and ischemia as important components in the pathogenesis of CM. Vessel occlusion and filling defects are likely to be due to sequestration of infected erythrocytes. Interventions which improve perfusion or limit hypoxic injury may be beneficial in CM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available