4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Comparison of virulence in community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus pulsotypes USA300 and USA400 in a rat model of pneumonia

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 198, Issue 4, Pages 561-570

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1086/590157

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R01AI40481] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [5K12HD043387-04] Funding Source: Medline
  3. PHS HHS [R01CCR 523379] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NCPDCID CDC HHS [U01-CI00384, R01CI000373] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. The predominant genetic background of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus has transitioned from USA400 to USA300 in most US communities. The explanation for this shift is unclear. We hypothesized that USA300 must be more pathogenic-specifically, that USA300 would have increased virulence when compared with USA400 in an animal model. Methods. Rats were inoculated intratracheally with 1 of 6 S. aureus isolates from the USA300 and USA400 backgrounds. We assessed mortality, in vivo bacterial growth, and histopathology. We assessed the in vitro expression of capsule and of selected genes believed to be important in virulence in S. aureus, including agr, saeRS, sarA, alpha-toxin (hla), and Panton-Valentine leukocidin (pvl). Results. USA300 isolates were more lethal, produced more severe pneumonia, and had higher in vivo bacterial density in the lung than did USA400 isolates. In vitro expression of agr, saeRS, sarA, hla, and pvl were greater in USA300 isolates. USA300 isolates were unencapsulated, whereas 2 of 3 USA400 isolates produced capsule. Conclusions. USA300 isolates were more virulent than USA400 isolates in a model of necrotizing pneumonia. The explanation for this is unclear, but it likely results from increased expression of S. aureus regulatory systems (e. g., agr, saeRS, and sarA) and the resultant upregulation of key virulence factors including alpha-toxin and PVL.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available