4.7 Article

Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) polymorphisms are associated with reversal reaction in leprosy

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 197, Issue 2, Pages 253-261

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1086/524688

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI025032-24, U54 AI054523-01, AI25032, AI22616, R01 AI032972, R37 AI025032, U54 AI054523, R01 AI032972-20, R01 AI025032] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Leprosy is characterized by a spectrum of clinical manifestations that depend on the type of immune response against the pathogen. Patients may undergo immunological changes known as reactional states (reversal reaction and erythema nodosum leprosum) that result in major clinical deterioration. The goal of the present study was to assess the effect of Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) polymorphisms on susceptibility to and clinical presentation of leprosy. Methods. Three polymorphisms in TLR2 (597C-->T, 1350T-->C, and a microsatellite marker) were analyzed in 431 Ethiopian patients with leprosy and 187 control subjects. The polymorphism-associated risk of developing leprosy, lepromatous (vs. tuberculoid) leprosy, and leprosy reactions was assessed by multivariate logistic regression models. Results. The microsatellite and the 597C3T polymorphisms both influenced susceptibility to reversal reaction. Although the 597T allele had a protective effect (odds ratio [OR], 0.34 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.17-0.68]; P = .002 under the dominant model), homozygosity for the 280-bp allelic length of the microsatellite strongly increased the risk of reversal reaction (OR, 5.83 [95% CI, 1.98-17.15]; P = .001 under the recessive model). These associations were consistent among 3 different ethnic groups. Conclusions. These data suggest a significant role for TLR-2 in the occurrence of leprosy reversal reaction and provide new insights into the immunogenetics of the disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available