4.7 Article

Impact of bacteremia on the pathogenesis of experimental pneumococcal meningitis

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 197, Issue 2, Pages 235-244

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1086/524874

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Bacteremia plays a major role in the outcome of pneumococcal meningitis. This experimental study investigated how bacteremia influences the pathophysiologic profile of the brain. Methods. Rats with Streptococcus pneumoniae meningitis were randomized to 1 of 3 groups of infected study rats: (1) rats with attenuated bacteremia resulting from intravenous injection of serotype-specific pneumococcal antibody, (2) rats with early-onset bacteremia resulting from concomitant intravenous infection, or (3) a meningitis control group. The blood-brain barrier (BBB) breakdown, ventricle size, brain water distribution, and brain pathologic findings were analyzed using magnetic resonance morphological and functional imaging. Laboratory data and clinical disease scores were obtained. Results. Attenuation of the bacteremic component of pneumococcal meningitis improved clinical disease symptoms and significantly reduced ventricle expansion and BBB breakdown (P < .05). Early-onset bacteremia did not further increase ventricle size or BBB leakage. Significantly increased brain edema developed among rats with both attenuated and early-onset bacteremia (P < .05). Focal brain pathologic findings were unaffected by bacteremia and were found to be associated with cerebrospinal fluid inflammation. Conclusion. Although brain lesions appear to result from local meningeal infection, systemic infection significantly contributes to clinical disease presentation and the pathophysiology of BBB breakdown and ventricle expansion. The different end points affected by the systemic and local infectious processes should be addressed in future studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available