4.2 Article

Mechanism and implication of cephalosporin penetration into oropharyngeal mucosa

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTION AND CHEMOTHERAPY
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages 70-74

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1007/s10156-008-0666-4

Keywords

Oropharyngeal; Mucosa; Saliva; Cefixime; Cephalexin

Funding

  1. King Saud University [CPRC107]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to explore the mechanism(s) by which oral cephalosporins penetrate into human oropharyngeal mucosa, and thus, the availability of sufficient concentrations at the site of infection. Two oral cephalosporin prototypes, cephalexin (first generation) and cefixime (third generation), were administered to five healthy subjects at two different visits with a 1-week washout period. Plasma and saliva samples were collected and drug concentrations were measured using an appropriate HPLC method. The maximum plasma concentrations (C-max) of cefixime and cephalexin were 2.97 +/- 0.24 mu g ml(-1) and 77.65 +/- 18.91 mu g ml(-1), respectively. These concentrations were associated with a maximum salivary concentration (C-Smax) of 0.56 mu g ml(-1) for cefixime and 3.34 mu g ml(-1) for cephalexin. Such levels exceed the reported minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) for Streptococcus pyogenes and Streptococcus pneumoniae. The average concentration of cefixime in saliva corresponded to its plasma free fraction (saliva/plasma [S/P] ratio; 0.34). However, this observation was not true for cephalexin, for which antibiotic concentrations in the saliva did not appear to correspond to its plasma free fraction (0.8-0.85), with an S/P ratio of only 0.092. Our findings indicate that an active transport mechanism exists for cefixime excretion into human oropharyngeal mucosa, whereas cephalexin is passively diffused, although to a limited extent, as measured by its salivary concentrations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available