4.7 Article

Triacetylfusarinine C: A urine biomarker for diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTION
Volume 78, Issue 2, Pages 150-157

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2018.09.006

Keywords

Aspergillosis; Biomarker; Diagnosis; Siderophore; Urine

Funding

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [W1253]
  2. Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Anniversary Fund) [15 346]
  3. National Institutes of Health [AI036214]
  4. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [W1253] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Early diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis (IA) remains challenging, with available diagnostics being limited by inadequate sensitivities and specificities. Triacetylfusarinine C, a fungal siderophore that has been shown to accumulate in urine in animal models, is a potential new biomarker for diagnosis of IA. Methods: We developed a method allowing absolute and matrix-independent mass spectrometric quantification of TAFC. Urine TAFC, normalized to creatinine, was determined in 44 samples from 24 patients with underlying hematologic malignancies and probable, possible or no IA according to current EORTC/MSG criteria and compared to other established biomarkers measured in urine and same-day blood samples. Results: TAFC/creatinine sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio for probable versus no IA (cut-off >= 3) were 0.86, 0.88, 6.86, 0.16 per patient. Conclusion: For the first time, we provide proof for the occurrence of TAFC in human urine. TAFC/creatinine index determination in urine showed promising results for diagnosis of IA offering the advantages of non-invasive sampling. Sensitivity and specificity were similar as reported for GM determination in serum and bronchoalveolar lavage, the gold standard mycological criterion for IA diagnosis. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The British Infection Association.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available