4.7 Article

Daptomycin is effective as antibiotic-lock therapy in a model of Staphylococcus aureus catheter-related infection

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTION
Volume 68, Issue 6, Pages 548-552

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2014.01.001

Keywords

Antibiotic-lock therapy; Catheter-related infection; Catheter related bloodstream infection; Daptomycin; Staphylococcus aureus; S. aureus biofilm; Vancomycin

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad, Instituto de Salud Carlos III e co - European Development Regional Fund A way to achieve Europe ERDF
  2. Spanish Network for the Research in Infectious Diseases [REIPI RD12/0015]
  3. Novartis Farmace ' utica Espana

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The effectiveness of daptomycin versus vancomycin for treating experimental methicillin-susceptible (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) catheter-related infection by antibiotic-lock technique was assessed. Methods: One MSSA strain and one clinical MRSA isolate were used. A preliminary in vitro study determined the minimum biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC) of vancomycin and daptomycin. An intravenous catheter was implanted in New Zealand white rabbits. Infection was induced by 24 h locking the catheter with 0.3 mL of broth culture containing MSSA or MRSA. The 24 h of antibiotic-lock treatment groups were: control, vancomycin 10 mg/mL, daptomycin 5 mg/mL and daptomycin 50 mg/mL. Results: Daptomycin showed greater in vitro activity than vancomycin against biofilm bacteria (MBECs of vancomycin and daptomycin for MSSA, > 2000 mg/L and 7 mg/L; MRSA, > 2000 mg/L and 15 mg/L). Daptomycin 5 mg/mL achieved significant reductions relative to vancomycin 10 mg/mL in log10 cfu recovered from catheter tips for both strains (P < 0.05). Only daptomycin 50 mg/mL achieved negative catheter tip cultures (up to 75% in MSSA and 85% in MRSA,

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available