4.7 Article

Enhanced serodiagnostic utility of novel Mycobacterium tuberculosis polyproteins

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTION
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages 366-375

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2012.10.029

Keywords

Tuberculosis; Serodiagnosis; Polyproteins

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30772067]
  2. National S&T Major Project for Infectious Diseases Control [2009ZX10004-718]
  3. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2011AA02A120]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: The detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis specific antibodies in human sera has been a rapid and important diagnostic aid for tuberculosis (TB) control and prevention. However, any single antigen is not enough to be used to cover the antibody profiles of all TB patients. Methods: Seven single antigens (38 kDa, ESAT-6, CFP10, Mtb8.4, MPT64, TB16.3 and Mtb8) were evaluated serodiagnostically. Two novel M. tuberculosis polyproteins, 38kD-ESAT6-CFP10 (38F) and Mtb8.4-MPT64-TB16.3-Mtb8 (64F), were expressed and the novel 38F-64F indirect ELISA assay used to analyze antibody responses to polyproteins in serum samples. Results: The sensitivity of the novel 38F-64F indirect ELISA alone was much higher than that of the sputum culture test (86.91% vs. 50.62%) and that of the sputum smear test (78.64% vs. 47.57%). The novel 38F-64F indirect ELISA had a sensitivity of 74.16% with sera from extrapulmonary TB patients and a sensitivity of 37.14% with sera from LTBI. The specificity of the novel 38F-64F indirect ELISA was 90.36% with the sera from healthy blood donors and 94.15% with the sera from non-TB patients. Conclusions: The novel 38F-64F indirect ELISA assay had effective diagnostic performance and would make meaningful contribution to the diagnosis of TB disease in developing countries. (C) 2012 The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available