4.7 Article

Serial QuantiFERON TB-Gold in-tube testing during LTBI therapy in candidates for TNFi treatment

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTION
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages 346-356

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2012.10.017

Keywords

Interferon-gamma release assay; Latent tuberculosis infection therapy; Rheumatic diseases; Tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors; QuantiFERON-TB Gold

Funding

  1. A.D.A. srl

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To evaluate the T-cell interferon (IFN)-gamma response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific antigens during latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) therapy in candidates for tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors (TNFi). Methods: 1490 Patients were screened for LTBI. One-hundred and sixty-six of them were treated for LTBI and followed-up with QuantiFERON-TB Gold (QFT-IT) testing at baseline (T0) and therapy completion (T1); 92 subjects were also tested 3-6 months after therapy completion (T2). Results: At T1 the QFT-IT reversion and conversion rates were 24% (27/111) and 18% (10/55), respectively. By multivariate analysis, the likelihood of reversion significantly decreased with older age (>50-60), larger TST size (>15 mm) and higher IFN-gamma value at T0 (>1 IU/ml); the likelihood of conversion increased with higher IFN-gamma levels at T0 (1 IU/ml) and in female patients. Quantitative data among those who scored QFT-IT-positive at T0 showed a decreasing trend of IFN-gamma levels between T0 and T1 that reached statistical significance when T0 was compared to T2, and T1 to T2. Conclusions: The data confirm the difficulty of interpreting the modulation of IFN-gamma levels during LTBI therapy. Currently, there is no evidence to support the use of QFT-IT in the clinical practice of monitoring LTBI treatment in candidates for TNFi. (C) 2012 The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available