4.7 Article

Risk factors and pathogenic significance of bacteremic pneumonia in adult patients with community-acquired pneumococcal pneumonia

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTION
Volume 66, Issue 1, Pages 34-40

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2012.08.011

Keywords

Community-acquired pneumonia; Streptococcus pneumoniae; Bacteremia; Risk factors; Treatment outcome

Funding

  1. Pfizer Inc. [0877X1-4448]
  2. Asia Pacific Foundation for Infectious Diseases (APFID), Seoul, Korea
  3. Korea Healthcare Technology R&D Project, Ministry for Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea [A102065]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: This study was performed to identify risk factors for the development of bacteremic pneumonia and to evaluate the impact of bacteremia on the outcome of pneumococcal pneumonia. Methods: Using a database from a surveillance study of community-acquired pneumococcal pneumonia, we compared data of the bacteremic group with that of the non-bacteremic group. Results: Among 981 adult patients with pneumococcal pneumonia, 114 (11.6%) patients who had documented pneumococcal bacteremia were classified into the bacteremic group. In a multivariable analysis, use of immunosuppressant drugs, younger age (<65 years), and DM were independent risk factors associated with the development of bacteremic pneumonia among patients with pneumococcal pneumonia (all P < 0.05). The mortality rate was significantly higher in the bacteremic group than in the non-bacteremic group (28.6% vs. 8.5%; P < 0.001). The multivariable analysis revealed that concomitant bacteremia was one of the significant risk factors associated with mortality (OR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.24-5.29), along with cerebrovascular disease and presentation with septic shock (all P < 0.05). Conclusions: Bacteremia was a common finding in pneumococcal pneumonia and was associated with a higher mortality rate. Several clinical variables may be useful for predicting bacteremic pneumonia among patients with pneumococcal pneumonia. (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The British Infection Association.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available