Journal
JOURNAL OF INFECTION
Volume 60, Issue 5, Pages 313-319Publisher
W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2010.02.013
Keywords
CD64; Diagnostic accuracy; Infection; Systematic review
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Objective: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of expression of CD64 on polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN) as a marker for bacterial infection. Methods: The analysis included studies of patients from all age groups that prospectively evaluated CD64 expression on PMNs for the diagnosis of bacterial infection. We evaluated the methodological quality of the studies according to the 25-item criteria developed by the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) committee. We calculated a summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve across studies included in the meta-analysis. Results: Themethodological quality score of the 13 included studies ranged from 9 to 16 points (maximum score was 25 points). The pooled sensitivity and specificity for CD64 expression on PMNs were 79% (95% CI: 70-86%) and 91% (95% CI: 85-95%), respectively. The area under curve (AUC) was 0.94. Conclusions: On the basis of this meta-analysis, CD64 expression on PMNs could be a useful diagnostic cell-based parameter of bacterial infections. However, published studies about this topic showed a low methodological quality. (C) 2010 The British Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available