4.7 Article

Clinical relevance of Mycobacterium chelonae-abscessus group isolation in 95 patients

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTION
Volume 59, Issue 5, Pages 324-331

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2009.08.016

Keywords

Mycobacterium abscessus; Mycobacterium bolletii; Mycobacterium chelonae; Mycobacterium infections, atypical; Mycobacterium massiliense; Cystic fibrosis; Nontuberculous mycobacteria; Opportunist mycobacteria

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To determine the clinical relevance of Mycobacterium chelonae-abscessus group isolation from clinical samples. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical files of all patients from whom these mycobacteria were isolated between January 1999 and January 2005 and re-identified the isolates by rpoB sequencing. We applied the American Thoracic Society (ATS) diagnostic criteria to establish clinical relevance. Results: Ninety-five patients were traced (56 M. chelonae, 25 Mycobacterium abscessus, 8 Mycobacterium massiliense, 6 Mycobacterium bolletii). Most isolates were cultured from pulmonary samples in patients with pre-existing pulmonary disease. Among patients with pulmonary isolates, 27% (20/74) meets ATS criteria; M. abscessus is most relevant (50%; 9/18), followed by M. massiliense (29%; 2/7), M. bolletii (20%; 1/5) and M. chelonae (18%; 8/44). Extrapulmonary disease presented as disseminated skin disease, eye disease specific for M. chelonae and otomastoiditis for M. abscessus. Treatment, especially for pulmonary M. abscessus disease, yielded limited results. Conclusions: One-fourth of the patients with pulmonary M. chelonae-abscessus group isolates met the ATS criteria; this percentage differs by species. Species distribution and clinical relevance differ from other regions. M. abscessus isolation in cystic fibrosis patients warrants special attention. Current ATS criteria might be too lenient to diagnose M. chelonae-abscessus group disease. (c) 2009 The British Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available