4.7 Article

Ertapenem: No effect on aerobic gram-negative susceptibilities to imipenem

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTION
Volume 57, Issue 2, Pages 123-127

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2008.06.001

Keywords

ertapenem; imipenem; antimicrobial resistance; surveillance; carbapenems; multidrug resistance; cross-resistance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To describe any potential effect on in vitro susceptibility to imipenem for aerobic gram-negative bacteria following the addition of ertapenem to the formulary of a large teaching hospital. Methods: Changes in imipenem susceptibilities for aerobic gram-negative bacteria were compared among clinical isolates from 2002 to 2007 using a Poisson model. Changes in the susceptibitity of imipenem to P. aeruginosa, K. pneumoniae, K. oxytoxa, E. coli, and S. marcescens were compared over time using a chi-squared test for trend. Carbapenem use was measured using a defined daily dose per 1000 patient days. Change in utilization was compared for all years. The prevalence of ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae, K. oxytoxa, and E. coli over time was compared. Results: Susceptibility to imipenem did not change after the addition of ertapenem and this most notably includes A aeruginosa (p = 0.43). Additionally, an increase in the incidence of ESBL K. pneumoniae from 2002 (4%) to 2007 (18%) p < 0.0001 occurred with significant increases in both imipenem and ertapenem use in that time frame (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The continued use of ertapenem over 5 years with predominant use of imipenem did not select for P. aeruginosa resistance to imipenem. The rising rate of community and healthcare associated ESBL K. pneumoniae increased total carbapenem use. (c) 2008 The British Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available