4.5 Article

Cashew apple bagasse as a source of sugars for ethanol production by Kluyveromyces marxianus CE025

Journal

JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MICROBIOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 38, Issue 8, Pages 1099-1107

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10295-010-0889-0

Keywords

Cashew apple bagasse; Cashew apple bagasse hydrolysate; Ethanol; Temperature; Kluyveromyces marxianus CE025

Funding

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)
  3. Agencia Nacional do Petroleo (ANP from Brazil)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The potential of cashew apple bagasse as a source of sugars for ethanol production by Kluyveromyces marxianus CE025 was evaluated in this work. This strain was preliminarily cultivated in a synthetic medium containing glucose and xylose and was able to produce ethanol and xylitol at pH 4.5. Next, cashew apple bagasse hydrolysate (CABH) was prepared by a diluted sulfuric acid pretreatment and used as fermentation media. This hydrolysate is rich in glucose, xylose, and arabinose and contains traces of formic acid and acetic acid. In batch fermentations of CABH at pH 4.5, the strain produced only ethanol. The effects of temperature on the kinetic parameters of ethanol fermentation by K. marxianus CE025 using CABH were also evaluated. Maximum specific growth rate (mu(max)), overall yields of ethanol based on glucose consumption Y(P/S1)(G) and based on glucose + xylose consumption (Y (P/S) ), overall yield of ethanol based on biomass (Y (P/X) ), and ethanol productivity (P (E)) were determined as a function of temperature. Best results of ethanol production were achieved at 30A degrees C, which is also quite close to the optimum temperature for the formation of biomass. The process yielded 12.36 +/- A 0.06 g l(-1) of ethanol with a volumetric production rate of 0.257 +/- A 0.002 g l(-1) h(-1) and an ethanol yield of 0.417 +/- A 0.003 g g(-1) glucose.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available