4.6 Article

The Effect of Life Cycle Cost Information on Consumer Investment Decisions Regarding Eco-Innovation

Journal

JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages 121-136

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00195.x

Keywords

behavioral economics; consumer behavior; industrial ecology; life cycle costing (LCC); sustainable consumption; sustainability marketing

Funding

  1. University of St. Gallen
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation
  3. EU

Ask authors/readers for more resources

P>Life cycle cost (LCC) computations are a well-established instrument for the evaluation of intertemporal choices in organizations, but they have not been widely adopted by private consumers yet. Consumer investment decisions for products and services with higher initial costs and lower operating costs are potentially subject to numerous cognitive biases, such as present-biased preferences or framing effects. This article suggests a classification for categorizing different cost profiles for eco-innovation and a conceptual model for the influence of LCC information on consumer decisions regarding eco-innovation. It derives hypotheses on the decision-making process for eco-innovation from a theoretical perspective. To verify the hypotheses, the publication reviews empirical studies evaluating the effects of LCC information on consumer investment decisions. It can be concluded that rather than finding ways to make customers pay more for environmentally sound products, the marketing challenge for eco-innovation should be reconceptualized as one of lowering customers' perceived initial cost and increasing awareness of LCC. Most existing studies report a positive effect of LCC information on the purchase likelihood of eco-innovations. Disclosing LCC information provides an important base for long-term thinking on the individual, corporate, and policy levels.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available