4.7 Article

Catalytic neutralization of acidic crude oil utilizing ammonia in ethylene glycol basic solution

Journal

JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages 2086-2094

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2013.09.037

Keywords

Naphthenic acid; Crude oil; Catalyst; Total acid number; Ammonia in ethylene glycol

Funding

  1. Research University Grant
  2. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia [01H58]
  3. Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation of Malaysia (MOSTI) for NSF scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Naphthenic acids in crude oil is a main contributor to the corrosion problem in the petroleum industry and removal of these acids from the crude oil fraction become a great concern nowadays. Catalytic neutralization is an alternative technique to be investigated in this study. A basic chemical with a dosing of 0.4% and 4% of ammonia solution in ethylene glycol (NH3-EG) were used as the acid removal agent with a concentration of 100 mg/L, 500 mg/L, and 1000 mg/L for three different crude oils which are Petronas Penapisan Melaka heavy (crude A) and light crude (crude B) and Korean crude (crude C). A series of alkaline earth metal oxide catalysts; calcium, barium and magnesium supported onto alumina with different calcination temperatures were used to enhance the reaction. The results showed 67.4% (3000 mg/L of 4% NH3-EG) reduction in TAN for crude A and 78.7% (10,000 mg/L of 4% NH3-EG) reduction for crude C by using the best studied catalyst which was Ca/Al2O3 with a calcination temperature of 1100 degrees C. For crude B, there was 71.2% reduction of TAN with 1000 mg/L of 0.4% of NH3-EG. Additionally, based on the results obtained, a mechanistic naphthenic acid reduction reaction pathway was postulated. (C) 2013 The Korean Society of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available