4.2 Review

Breaking immunotolerance of tumors: A new perspective for dendritic cell therapy

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOTOXICOLOGY
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages 311-318

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/1547691X.2013.865094

Keywords

Cancer; dendritic cells; immunotherapy; tumor-induced immunosuppression

Categories

Funding

  1. State Funds for National Centre for Research and Development (NCBR) [GR831]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of dendritic cells (DC) in cancer immunotherapy is based on their potent abilities to present antigens, so they can act as 'natural adjuvants' to enhance immunogenicity of tumor antigens and stimulate specific cytotoxic T-cells. Large amounts of DC can be generated from bone marrow, neonatal cord blood, and peripheral blood CD34(+) hematopoietic stem cells, or from peripheral blood monocytes. The DC can then be pulsed with tumor antigens and re-infused. In vitro, antigen-pulsed DC can stimulate allogeneic T-cell proliferation and induction of autologous specific cytotoxic T-cells; in vivo, the cells inhibit the growth of tumors or protect hosts (i.e. mice) from development of inoculated tumors. The results of preliminary clinical trials have shown that DC vaccines are safe and elicit immune responses; however, the rates of clinical responses are low. It has become quite clear that one key reason for unsatisfactory clinical results is tumor-induced immunosuppression. Among the factors contributing to this type of immunosuppression are populations of regulatory cells including: T-regulatory (T-reg) cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC), tumor-associated macrophages (TAM), and DC expressing 2,3-dioxygenase indoleamine (IDO-DC). This review presents an overview of the current understanding about populations of regulatory cells and the most current research efforts directed to overcome immunosuppressive activity due to the tumor microenvironment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available