4.4 Article

Minimally invasive treatment combined with cytokine-induced killer cells therapy lower the short-term recurrence rates of hepatocellular carcinomas

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOTHERAPY
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages 63-71

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/CJI.0b013e31815a121b

Keywords

hepatocellular carcinoma; cytokine-induced killer cells; T-lymphocyte subsets; NK cells; immunologic function

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after minimally invasive therapy is frequent. Adoptive immunotherapy is thought to be an effective method to lower recurrence and metastasis rates of malignant tumors. Therefore, 85 HCC patients after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation therapy were randomized to immunotherapy group and no adjuvant therapy group. Autologous cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells were transfused via hepatic artery to the patients. The alteration of levels of lymphocyte subsets in peripheral blood of patients was examined by flow cytometry. All patients were screened by computed tomography every 2 months to observe the tumor recurrent conditions. After CIK cell infusions, the percentages of CD3(+), CD4(+), CD56(+), CD3(+)CD56(+) cells, and CD+/CD8(+) ratio increased from 68.6 +/- 11.0%, 31.1 +/- 9.0%, 15.6 +/- 7.9 %, 5.2 +/- 3.1 %, and 1.1 +/- 0.5 to 70.7 +/- 10.1 %, 33.5 +/- 8.0%, 18.4 +/- 9.4%, 5.9 +/- 2.8%, and 1.3 +/- 0.7, respectively (P<0.05); whereas the percentage of CD8(+) cells decreased from 31.1 +/- 7.8% to 28.6 +/- 8.3% (P < 0.05). The 1-year and 18-month recurrence rates of the study group were 8.9% and 15.6%, compared with 30.0% and 40.0% of the control group (both P value < 0.05). The data suggest that CIK cell transfusion is an effective treatment. It can boost the immunologic function in HCC patients and plays an important role in reducing the recurrence rate of HCC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available