4.6 Article

Impaired B Cell Inhibition by Lupus Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells Is Caused by Reduced CCL2 Expression

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 193, Issue 10, Pages 5306-5314

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1400036

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81273304]
  2. Major International (Regional) Joint Research Project [81120108021]
  3. Jiangsu Province Kejiao Xingwei Program
  4. Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) from healthy human and normal mice can inhibit normal B cell proliferation, differentiation, and Ab secretion in vitro. However, it remains unknown whether MSC from lupus-like mice and patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) exhibit the same immunoregulatory activity as normal MSC for B cell inhibition and, if not, what the underlying molecular mechanism would be. In this study, we showed that bone marrow-derived MSCs from lupus-like mice and SLE patients had an impairment in suppressing normal B cell proliferation and differentiation, which was caused by the reduction of CCL2 levels. Knockdown of CCL2 in normal MSC damaged their suppressive capacity for B cells. Conversely, overexpression of CCL2 in lupus MSCs restored their immunoregulatory ability for B cells in vitro and ameliorated the pathology of lupus nephritis and serological changes in MRL/lpr mice in vivo. Mechanistically, MSC-mediated B cell inhibition was dependent on matrix metalloproteinase proteolytic processing of CCL2. These findings reveal a novel function of CCL2 in B cell regulation by MSCs and suggest that CCL2 manipulation on MSCs may serve as a potential pathway for developing the more effective MSC-based therapy in autoimmune diseases associated with B cell activation, such as SLE.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available