4.6 Article

Dopamine Inhibits the Effector Functions of Activated NK Cells via the Upregulation of the D5 Receptor

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 193, Issue 6, Pages 2792-2800

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1401114

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry of Health [GR-2008-1135082]
  2. European Union (Marie Curie International Reintegration) [249249, 322093]
  3. intramural research program of Humanitas Clinical and Research Center
  4. Fondazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro
  5. Fondazione Umberto Veronesi
  6. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro Funding Source: Custom

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Several lines of evidence indicate that dopamine (DA) plays a key role in the cross-talk between the nervous and immune systems. In this study, we disclose a novel immune-regulatory role for DA: inhibition of effector functions of activated NK lymphocytes via the selective upregulation of the D5 dopaminergic receptor in response to prolonged cell stimulation with rIL-2. Indeed, engagement of this D1-like inhibitory receptor following binding with DA suppresses NK cell proliferation and synthesis of IFN-gamma. The inhibition of IFN-gamma production occurs through blocking the repressor activity of the p50/c-REL dimer of the NF-kappa B complex. Indeed, the stimulation of the D5 receptor on rIL-2-activated NK cells inhibits the binding of p50 to the microRNA 29a promoter, thus inducing a de novo synthesis of this miRNA. In turn, the increased levels of microRNA 29a were inversely correlated with the ability of NK cells to produce IFN-gamma. Taken together, our findings demonstrated that DA switches off activated NK cells, thus representing a checkpoint exerted by the nervous system to control the reactivity of these innate immune effectors in response to activation stimuli and to avoid the establishment of chronic and pathologic inflammatory processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available