4.6 Article

Sustained and Incomplete Recovery of Naive CD8+ T Cell Precursors after Sepsis Contributes to Impaired CD8+ T Cell Responses to Infection

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 190, Issue 5, Pages 1991-2000

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1202379

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [A183286]
  2. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Merit Review Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Patients who survive severe sepsis often display compromised immune function with impairment in innate and adaptive immune responses. These septic patients are highly susceptible to secondary infections with intracellular pathogens that are usually controlled by CD8(+) T cells. It is not known when and if this observed immunoparalysis of CD8(+) T cell immunity recovers, and the long-term consequences of sepsis on the ability of naive CD8(+) T cells to respond to subsequent infections are poorly understood. In this study, using the cecal-ligation and puncture mouse model of sepsis, we show that sepsis induces a rapid loss of naive CD8(+) T cells. However, IL-15-dependent numerical recovery is observed a month after initial septic insult. Numerical recovery is accompanied by IL-15-dependent phenotypic changes where a substantial proportion of naive (Ag-inexperienced) CD8(+) T cells display a memory-like phenotype (CD44(hi)/CD11a(hi)). Importantly, the impairment of naive CD8(+) T cells to respond to viral and bacterial infection was sustained for month(s) after sepsis induction. Incomplete recovery of naive CD8(+) T cell precursors was observed in septic mice, suggesting that the availability of naive precursors contributes to the sustained impairment in primary CD8(+) T cell responses. Thus, sepsis can result in substantial and long-lasting changes in the available CD8(+) T cell repertoire affecting the capacity of the host to respond to new infections. The Journal of Immunology, 2013, 190: 1991-2000.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available