4.6 Article

miR-223 Deficiency Increases Eosinophil Progenitor Proliferation

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 190, Issue 4, Pages 1576-1582

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1202897

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Heart Lung and Blood Institute [F30HL104892]
  2. Albert J. Ryan Foundation
  3. National Institutes of Health [NIH] [T32HD046387, R01AI083450]
  4. University of Cincinnati Medical Scientist Training Program (NIH Grant) [T32GM063483]
  5. Campaign Urging Research for Eosinophilic Disease
  6. Buckeye Foundation
  7. Food Allergy Research and Education (FARE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, microRNAs have been shown to be involved in hematopoietic cell development, but their role in eosinophilopoiesis has not yet been described. In this article, we show that miR-223 is upregulated during eosinophil differentiation in an ex vivo bone marrow-derived eosinophil culture system. Targeted ablation of miR-223 leads to an increased proliferation of eosinophil progenitors. We found upregulation of a miR-223 target gene, IGF1R, in the eosinophil progenitor cultures derived from miR-223(-/-) mice compared with miR-223(+/+) littermate controls. The increased proliferation of miR-223(-/-) eosinophil progenitors was reversed by treatment with an IGF1R inhibitor (picropodophyllin). Whole-genome microarray analysis of differentially regulated genes between miR-223(+/+) and miR-223(-/-) eosinophil progenitor cultures identified a specific enrichment in genes that regulate hematologic cell development. Indeed, miR-223(-/-) eosinophil progenitors had a delay in differentiation. Our results demonstrate that microRNAs regulate the development of eosinophils by influencing eosinophil progenitor growth and differentiation and identify a contributory role for miR-223 in this process. The Journal of Immunology, 2013, 190: 1576-1582.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available