4.6 Article

Identification of a Tissue-Specific, C/EBPβ-Dependent Pathway of Differentiation for Murine Peritoneal Macrophages

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 191, Issue 9, Pages 4665-4675

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1300581

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [AI24335, AI56363, P30-AI051445, UC6-AI058607]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Macrophages and dendritic cells (DC) are distributed throughout the body and play important roles in pathogen detection and tissue homeostasis. In tissues, resident macrophages exhibit distinct phenotypes and activities, yet the transcriptional pathways that specify tissue-specific macrophages are largely unknown. We investigated the functions and origins of two peritoneal macrophage populations in mice: small and large peritoneal macrophages (SPM and LPM, respectively). SPM and LPM differ in their ability to phagocytose apoptotic cells, as well as in the production of cytokines in response to LPS. In steady-state conditions, SPM are sustained by circulating precursors, whereas LPM are maintained independently of hematopoiesis; however, both populations are replenished by bone marrow precursors following radiation injury. Transcription factor analysis revealed that SPM and LPM express abundant CCAAT/enhancer binding protein (C/EBP)-beta. Cebpb(-/-) mice exhibit elevated numbers of SPM-like cells but lack functional LPM. Alveolar macrophages are also missing in Cebpb(-/-) mice, although macrophage populations in the spleen, kidney, skin, mesenteric lymph nodes, and liver are normal. Adoptive transfer of SPM into Cebpb(-/-) mice results in SPM differentiation into LPM, yet donor SPM do not generate LPM after transfer into C/EBP beta-sufficient mice, suggesting that endogenous LPM inhibit differentiation by SPM. We conclude that C/EBP beta plays an intrinsic, tissue-restricted role in the generation of resident macrophages.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available