4.6 Article

Dynamic Roles of Type I and Type II IFNs in Early Infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 188, Issue 12, Pages 6205-6215

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1200255

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 AI059667, R01 AI051242]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although the protective role of type II IFN, or IFN-gamma, against Mycobacterium tuberculosis has been established, the effects of type I IFNs are still unclear. One potential confounding factor is the overlap of function between the two signaling pathways. We used mice carrying null mutations in the type I IFNR, type II IFNR, or both and compared their immune responses to those of wildtype mice following aerosol infection with M. tuberculosis. We discovered that, in the absence of a response to IFN-gamma, type I IFNs play a nonredundant protective role against tuberculosis. Mice unable to respond to both types of IFNs had more severe lung histopathology for similar bacterial loads and died significantly earlier than did mice with impaired IFN-gamma signaling alone. We excluded a role for type I IFN in T cell recruitment, which was IFN-gamma dependent, whereas both types of IFNs were required for optimal NK cell recruitment to the lungs. Type I IFN had a time-dependent influence on the composition of lung myeloid cell populations, in particular by limiting the abundance of M. tuberculosis-infected recruited macrophages after the onset of adaptive immunity. We confirmed that response to IFN-gamma was essential to control intracellular mycobacterial growth, without any additional effect of type I IFN. Together, our results imply a model in which type I IFN limit the number of target cells that M. tuberculosis can infect in the lungs, whereas IFN-gamma enhances their ability to restrict bacterial growth. The Journal of Immunology, 2012, 188: 6205-6215.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available