4.6 Article

Role of Mast Cells and Basophils in IgE Responses and in Allergic Airway Hyperresponsiveness

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 188, Issue 4, Pages 1809-1818

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1101746

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan
  2. National Institute of Biomedical Innovation
  3. Institute of Physical and Chemical Research
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23659243, 23659435, 21390303, 22390167, 22116010, 23390262, 21390116, 22790951] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We established a diphtheria toxin (DT)-based conditional deletion system using 114 enhancer elements previously shown to be specific for IL-4 production in mast cells (MCs) or basophils (Mas-TRECK and Bas-TRECK mice). DT treatment of Bas-TRECK mice resulted in specific deletion of basophils, whereas both MCs and basophils were deleted in Mas-TRECK mice. DT-treated Mas-TRECK mice had impaired passive cutaneous anaphylaxis, IgE-mediated passive systemic anaphylaxis, and IgE-mediated chronic allergic inflammation, whereas DT-treated Bas-TRECK mice had impaired IgE-mediated chronic allergic inflammation. Using these mice, we also sought to tease out the role of MCs and basophils in airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR). Although MC deletion resulted in a slight increase in basal Ag-specific IgE levels and significant increases in basal IgE levels, we found that this deletion markedly impaired the AHR effector phase and was accompanied by decreased histamine levels. By contrast, basophil deletion had no effect on the AHR effector phase or on IgE production induced by systemic OVA immunization. Our results, using these newly established Mas-TRECK and Bas-TRECK models, demonstrated an indispensable role for MCs as effector cells in AHR. The Journal of Immunology, 2012, 188: 1809-1818.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available