4.6 Article

Dectin-1 and IL-17A Suppress Murine Asthma Induced by Aspergillus versicolor but Not Cladosporium cladosporioides Due to Differences in β-Glucan Surface Exposure

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 189, Issue 7, Pages 3609-3617

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1200589

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 HL098135, AR-47363, DK78392, DK90971]
  2. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [F30 HL103087]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is considerable evidence supporting a role for mold exposure in the pathogenesis and expression of childhood asthma. Aspergillus versicolor and Cladosporium cladosporioides are common molds that have been implicated in asthma. In a model of mold-induced asthma, mice were repeatedly exposed to either A. versicolor or C. cladosporioides spores. The two molds induced distinct phenotypes, and this effect was observed in both BALB/c and C57BL/6 strains. C. cladosporioides induced robust airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), eosinophilia, and a predominately Th2 response, whereas A. versicolor induced a strong Th17 response and neutrophilic inflammation, but very mild AHR. Neutralization of IL-17A resulted in strong AHR and eosinophilic inflammation following A. versicolor exposure. In Dectin-1-deficient mice, A. versicolor exposure resulted in markedly attenuated IL-17A and robust AHR compared with wild-type mice. In contrast, C. cladosporioides induced AHR and eosinophilic inflammation independent of IL-17A and Dectin-1. A. versicolor, but not C. cladosporioides, spores had increased exposure of beta-glucans on their surface and were able to bind Dectin-1. Thus, the host response to C. cladosporioides was IL-17A- and Dectin-1-independent, whereas Dectin-1- and IL-17A-dependent pathways were protective against the development of asthma after exposure to A. versicolor. The Journal of Immunology, 2012, 189: 3609-3617.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available