4.6 Article

Why the Structure but Not the Activity of the Immunoproteasome Subunit Low Molecular Mass Polypeptide 2 Rescues Antigen Presentation

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 189, Issue 4, Pages 1868-1877

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1103592

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. German National Science Foundation [GR1517/5-1, PR-175/10-2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The proteasome is responsible for the generation of most epitopes presented on MHC class I molecules. Treatment of cells with IFN-gamma leads to the replacement of the constitutive catalytic subunits beta 1, beta 2, and beta 5 by the inducible subunits low molecular mass polypeptide (LMP) 2 (beta 1i), multicatalytic endopeptidase complex-like-1 (beta 2i), and LMP7 (beta 5i), respectively. The incorporation of these subunits is required for the production of numerous MHC class I-restricted T cell epitopes. The structural features rather than the proteolytic activity of an immunoproteasome subunit are needed for the generation of some epitopes, but the underlying mechanisms have remained elusive. Experiments with LMP2-deficient splenocytes revealed that the generation of the male HY-derived CTL-epitope UTY246-254 was dependent on LMP2. Treatment of male splenocytes with an LMP2-selective inhibitor did not reduce UTY246-254 presentation, whereas silencing of beta 1 activity increased presentation of UTY246-254. In vitro degradation experiments showed that the caspase-like activity of b1 was responsible for the destruction of this CTL epitope, whereas it was preserved when LMP2 replaced beta 1. Moreover, inhibition of the beta 5 subunit rescued the presentation of the influenza matrix 58-66 epitope, thus suggesting that a similar mechanism can apply to the exchange of beta 5 by LMP7. Taken together, our data provide a rationale why the structural property of an immunoproteasome subunit rather than its activity is required for the generation of a CTL epitope. The Journal of Immunology, 2012, 189: 1868-1877.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available